the Internet Windows Android

Intel Core i5 processors for the LGA1151 platform. Intel Core i5 processors for platforms LGA1150 and LGA1151 The most powerful processor on the LGA 1151 socket

Socket 1151: What processors are suitable

Socket LGA 1151 is a relevant socket to install Intel processors. It is on Socket 1151 that all the latest Intel Class Intel processors are installed. In this article you can find out which processors are suitable for Socket LGA 1151 and what needs to be done to not be mistaken when buying a processor.

So, Socket LGA 1151 is a socket for Intel processors with Skylake, Kaby Lake and Coffee Lake architectures.

  • Skylake is the sixth generation of Intel Core processor microarchitecture. According to the "Tik-So" strategy, which Intel adheres to, this architecture has received significant changes and improvements, but without switching to a new technical process. Like the Broadwell architecture, the Skylake architecture uses 14 nanometer technical process. The first Chips Skylake appeared on sale in August 2015. The main features of the Skylake steel architecture: Support Thunderbolt 3.0, Support 512-bit AVX 3.2 Vector Instructions, SATA Express Support, New DMI 3.0 Bus, Built-in Image Processing Processor.
  • Kaby Lake is the seventh generation of Intel Core processor microarchitecture. According to the "Tik-So" strategy, Kaby Lake is an improved version of the Skylake architecture on the same 14-nm technical process. The first processors of this generation were commercially available at the beginning of 2017. The main features of the Kaby Lake steel architecture: Support USB 3.1, Intel Optane Memory Support, HEVC video encoding formats (H.265) and VP9, \u200b\u200bsupport for HDCP 2.2 technology, official compatibility with Microsoft Windows 10.
  • Coffee Lake is the eighth generation of the Intel Core processor microarchitecture. According to the "Tik-So" strategy, the Coffee Lake architecture is an improved version of Kaby Lake with the same 14-nm technical process. The first processors of this generation began to be sold on October 5, 2017. The main features of the CoFfee Lake steel architecture: an enlarged number of cores, TURBO BOOST 2.0 technology, support for the second generation USB 3.1 at a speed of up to 10 Gb / s, support for Intel Wireless-AC, support for the new generation of Intel Optane.

Below you will find a list of all processors that were produced performed by Socket 1151. This information can be used for the initial selection of the processor to the motherboard. But, before making a decision on the purchase of a processor, you need to be clarified on the manufacturer's website of the motherboard, whether your motherboard has chosen your chosen processor. Since the coincidence of the socket on the motherboard and the processor does not mean that they will work together. For example, the processors of the eighth generation COFFEE LAKE can only work with the chipsets of the 300th series. A similar situation with the Xeon server, they only work on motherboards with server chipsets.

Celeron processors under Socket LGA 1151:

Processor name Number of Cores Number of streams Clock frequency (MHz) TURBO BOOST (MHz)
Celeron G3900TE 2 2 2300 -
Celeron G3900T. 2 2 2600 -
Celeron G3930T. 2 2 2700 -
Celeron G3930Te 2 2 2700 -
Celeron G3900. 2 2 2800 -
Celeron G3920. 2 2 2900 -
Celeron G3930E. 2 2 2900 -
Celeron G3930. 2 2 2900 -
Celeron G3950. 2 2 3000 -

Pentium processors under Socket LGA 1151:

Processor name Number of Cores Number of streams Clock frequency (MHz) TURBO BOOST (MHz)
Pentium G4400Te 2 2 2400 -
Pentium G4560T. 2 4 2900 -
Pentium G4400T. 2 2 2900 -
Pentium G4500T. 2 2 3000 -
Pentium G4600T. 2 4 3000 -
Pentium G4400. 2 2 3300 -
Pentium G4500. 2 2 3500 -
Pentium G4560. 2 4 3500 -
Pentium G4600. 2 4 3600 -
Pentium G4520. 2 2 3600 -
Pentium G4620. 2 4 3700 -

Core i3 processors under Socket LGA 1151:

Processor name Number of Cores Number of streams Clock frequency (MHz) TURBO BOOST (MHz)
Core i3-6100te 2 4 2700 -
Core i3-6100T. 2 4 3200 -
Core i3-6300T. 2 4 3300 -
Core i3-7100T. 2 4 3400 -
Core i3-7101Te 2 4 3400 -
Core i3-7300T. 2 4 3500 -
Core i3-8100. 4 4 3600 -
Core i3-6098p 2 4 3600 -
Core i3-6100. 2 4 3700 -
Core i3-6300. 2 4 3800 -
Core i3-6320 2 4 3900 -
Core i3-7100. 2 4 3900 -
Core i3-7101E 2 4 3900 -
Core i3-8350k. 4 4 4000 -
Core i3-7300 2 4 4000 -
Core i3-7320 2 4 4100 -
Core i3-7350K. 2 4 4200 -

Core i5 processors under Socket LGA 1151:

Processor name Number of Cores Number of streams Clock frequency (MHz) TURBO BOOST (MHz)
Core i5-6400T. 4 4 2200 2800
Core i5-6500Te 4 4 2300 3300
Core i5-7400T. 4 4 2400 3000
Core i5-6500T. 4 4 2500 3100
Core i5-7500T. 4 4 2700 3300
Core i5-6600T. 4 4 2700 3500
Core i5-6400. 4 4 2700 3300
Core i5-7600T. 4 4 2800 3700
Core i5-8400. 6 6 2800 4000
Core i5-6402p 4 4 2800 3400
Core i5-7400 4 4 3000 3500
Core i5-6500 4 4 3200 3600
Core i5-6600. 4 4 3300 3900
Core i5-7500 4 4 3400 3800
Core i5-6600K. 4 4 3500 3900
Core i5-7600 4 4 3500 4100
Core i5-8600K. 6 6 3600 4300
Core i5-7600K. 4 4 3800 4200

Core i7 processors under Socket LGA 1151:

Processor name Number of Cores Number of streams Clock frequency (MHz) TURBO BOOST (MHz)
Core i7-6700te 4 8 2400 3400
Core i7-6700T. 4 8 2800 3600
Core i7-7700T. 4 8 2900 3800
Core i7-8700. 6 12 3200 4600
Core i7-6700 4 8 3400 4000
Core i7-7700. 4 8 3600 4200
Core i7-8700K. 6 12 3700 4700
Core i7-6700K. 4 8 4000 4200
Core i7-7700k. 4 8 4200 4500

Xeon processors under Socket LGA 1151:

Processor name Number of Cores Number of streams Clock frequency (MHz) TURBO BOOST (MHz)
Xeon E3-1235L V5. 4 4 2000 3000
Xeon E3-1240L V5. 4 8 2100 3200
Xeon E3-1268L V5. 4 8 2400 3400
Xeon E3-1260L V5. 4 8 2900 3900
Xeon E3-1220 V5. 4 4 3000 3500
Xeon E3-1220 V6. 4 4 3000 3500
Xeon E3-1225 V6. 4 4 3300 3700
Xeon E3-1225 V5. 4 4 3300 3700
Xeon E3-1230 V5. 4 8 3400 3800
Xeon E3-1230 V6. 4 8 3500 3900
Xeon E3-1240 V5. 4 8 3500 3900
Xeon E3-1245 V5. 4 8 3500 3900
Xeon E3-1275 V5. 4 8 3600 4000
Xeon E3-1270 V5. 4 8 3600 4000
Xeon E3-1245 V6. 4 8 3700 4100
Xeon E3-1280 V5. 4 8 3700 4000
Xeon E3-1240 V6. 4 8 3700 4100
Xeon E3-1275 V6. 4 8 3800 4200
Xeon E3-1270 V6. 4 8 3800 4200
Xeon E3-1280 V6. 4 8 3900 4200
Xeon E3-1285 V6. 4 8 4100 4500

It is also necessary to recall that at the time of writing the article Socket LGA 1151 is a relevant platform and new processors in the future can still be released. If such processors appear, the information in the article will be updated.

How to check the processor support on the manufacturer's website

As we have already written above, the ability to install the processor in the motherboard does not yet guarantee that this processor will work with it. Therefore, before buying a processor, you should always watch a list of supported processors on the website of the manufacturer of the motherboard.

It is done very simple. First you need to learn the manufacturer of your motherboard and the exact name of the model. This information can be obtained in the CPU-Z program on the Mainboard tab.

After that, you need to explore the information on the website of the manufacturer of the motherboard. There must be a list of supported processors. Usually this list can be found in the "Support" or "Support" section.

Processors from this list of 100 percent are supported by the motherboard and you can safely buy them.

comp-Security.net.

What processors are suitable for socket 1151 and 1151v2

Hello, technoblog readers. Today I will tell you which processors are suitable under Sotet 1151 (Skylake, Kaby Lake), as well as 1151V2 (Coffee Lake). In this article, we will try to tell about the most powerful, inexpensive and cheap Intel Core, Pentium and Celeron chips.

The list of CPU will be built as a list so that you have a more accurate view of the models presented in the market.

And yes, it is worth making an important refinement: Socket LGA1151 does not imply reverse compatibility with 1150 and does not support Xeon server processors.

Table compatibility table

Socket 1151 from Intel is very cunning in essence, because it has 2 versions: the first supports the chips of the 6th and 7th generations, and the second is only the 8th. Regarding the AM3 socket, the picture is much easier, but it's not about him.
Let's see which processors I5 of different generations, as well as I3, I7, Pentium and Celeron are capable of working at 1151 Gen 1.
Now consider the line of chips that are suitable for the motherboard with a socket 1151v2.

Optimal processor for its value

And now the most interesting part of the comparison. We designated which processor is suitable for a specific socket. Now it remains to decide on the model of the chip itself. If you want to learn more about the CPU - we recommend reading this article.
And now we will go through the most vivid representatives of 6.7 and 8th generations:

Skylake - Intel i5 6400T engineering sample. At one time, this processor has made a lot of noise, because possessed extremely low cost, 4 productive cores with a frequency of up to 2.8 GHz and a very modest heat pump of 35 W.

Kaby Lake - Intel Pentium G4620. The so-called "hyperpen" has become cult, among gamers at the time of the exit, since he offered the Intel Core i3-7100 functionality at a significantly lower cost. It is also worth mentioning the vigorous middling I5-7400 and the top version of i7-7700K, in which 4 kernels and 8 data processing threads. Stone and to this day is considered a relevant, powerful and interesting solution for progressive systems, and also supports acceleration up to 5 GHz on the factor.

Coffee Lake - I5-8400. The appearance of the 8th generation of Intel chips added not only a new socket, but also 2 additional kernels of each line, with the exception of Celeron and Pentium. Have a 6-nuclear processor that can automatically increase the frequency from 2.8 to 4 GHz is a very successful contribution to the future and therefore I bold it recommend it (and at the same time for you an interesting offer - Intel Core i5 8400 + free shipping).

Differences between 1151 and 1151V2

It is not a secret for a long time that the processor connector intended for sets of system logic of the 100th and 200th series is absolutely not compatible with the 300th. And the point is not even that Intel wants to earn more money. The introduction of additional cores forced engineers in the root to recycled Coffee Lake processors to ensure the stable operation of chips, even under extremal acceleration.
Key changes affected VCC and VSS (Earth) contact sites. At the same time, the number of previously reserved RSVD contacts has decreased. Thus, the situation is as follows:

Skylake / Kaby Lake Coffee Lake
VCC. 110 128
VSS. 364 378
RSVD. 46 25

As you can see, "make friends" old chips with new motherboards are physically impossible, like a chinese plug into a European outlet. Yes, there are enthusiasts that managed to start the Kaby Lake on the Z370 by modifying the BIOS, however, the lion's share of functions in this case worked unstable, and the rest was completely absent.

So if you have a lot of time free time - you can try, but I strongly do not recommend this.

I hope that the article was useful to you, so subscribe, comment, share with loved ones. See you in new articles. Until.

Sincerely Andrei Andreev

infotechnica.ru.

characteristics, support processor, comparison with other sockets

LGA1356, also known as Socket B2, was released in 2012 and replaced Socet 1366. It has a lot in common with a popular LGA2011, but compared to it is somewhat simplified.

Main differences:

  • Memory Controller Supports 3 Channels instead of 4
  • The number of PCIe lines supported by the processor controller decreased to 24 (in processors LGA2011 - 40)
  • Only 1 QPI bus, the maximum multiprocessor configuration includes only 2 stones (on a socket 2011 you can use up to 4)

Comparison of sockets 1366 - 2011 - 1356

Sockets: LGA1366. LGA2011
Maximum number of kernels / streams 6/12 10/20 10/20
Dissected power 40 - 130 W 50 - 130 W 40 - 95 W
Maximum amount of L3 cache on the kernel 3 MB 2.5 MB 2.5 MB
Memory Channels on DIMM Modules / Modules on Channel (DPC) 3 channels, up to 2 DPC 4 channels, up to 3 DPC 3 channels, up to 2 DPC
Officially supported memory standards Until DDR3-1333 To DDR3-1600 To DDR3-1600
Maximum supported RAM using 8 gigabyte modules 96 GB 192 GB 96 GB
Support for dual processor systems there is there is there is
QPI bus controller There is, in Xeon 55xx processors - two-channel There are two-channel There are, single-channel
PCI-E 3.0 Tire Controller Not 40 lines PCI-E 3.0, 10 conclusters 24 Lines PCI-E 3.0, 6 conclusters
Support integrated graphics processor Not Not Not
DMI tire controller Not DMI 2.0 DMI 2.0

What processors are supported

LGA1356 works with processors on well-known architectures Sandy and Ivy Bridge. Performance is extremely close to similar stones for socket 2011.

Sandy Bridge.

Model nuclear / streams Frequency Maximum frequency in TurboBoost L3cash TDP
Xeon E5-2403. 4 / 4 1.8 Ghz. 10 Mb. 80w
Xeon E5-2407. 4 / 4 2.2 Ghz. 10 Mb. 80w
Xeon E5-2418L 4 / 8 2 ghz. 2.1 Ghz. 10 Mb. 50w.
Xeon E5-2428L 6 / 12 1.8 Ghz. 2 ghz. 15 MB. 60w.
Xeon E5-2449L 8 / 16 1.4 Ghz. 1.8 Ghz. 20 Mb. 50w.
Xeon E5-2420 6 / 12 1.9 Ghz. 2.4 Ghz. 15 MB. 95W.
Xeon E5-2430L 6 / 12 2 ghz. 2.5 Ghz. 15 MB. 60w.
Xeon E5-2430. 6 / 12 2.2 Ghz. 2.7 Ghz. 15 MB. 95W.
Xeon E5-2448L 8 / 16 1.8 Ghz. 2.1 Ghz. 20 Mb. 70w.
Xeon E5-2440. 6 / 12 2.4 Ghz. 2.9 Ghz. 15 MB. 95W.
Xeon E5-2450L 8 / 16 1.8 Ghz. 2.3 Ghz. 20 Mb. 70w.
Xeon E5-2450. 8 / 16 2.1 Ghz. 2.9 Ghz. 20 Mb. 95W.
Xeon E5-2470 8 / 16 2.3 Ghz. 3.1 Ghz. 20 Mb. 95W.
Pentium 1405. 2 / 2 1.2 Ghz. 1.8 Ghz. 5 Mb. 40w.
Pentium 1403. 2 / 2 2.6 Ghz. 5 Mb. 80w
Pentium 1407. 2 / 2 2.8 Ghz. 5 Mb. 80w
Xeon E5-1428L 6 / 12 1.8 Ghz. 15 MB. 60w.
Xeon E5-1410 4 / 8 2.8 Ghz. 3.2 Ghz. 10 Mb. 80w

Ivy Bridge.

Model nuclear / thread Frequency Maximum frequency in TurboBoost L3KES TDP
Xeon E5-2403 V2. 4 / 4 1.8 Ghz. 10 Mb. 80w
Xeon E5-2407 V2. 4 / 4 2.4 Ghz. 10 Mb. 80w
Xeon E5-2420 V2. 6 / 12 2.2 Ghz. 2.7 Ghz. 15 MB. 80w
Xeon E5-2430L V2. 6 / 12 2.4 Ghz. 2.8 Ghz. 15 MB. 60w.
Xeon E5-2430 V2. 6 / 12 2.5 Ghz. 3 Ghz. 15 MB. 80w
Xeon E5-2440 V2. 8 / 16 1.9 Ghz. 2.4 Ghz. 20 Mb. 95W.
Xeon E5-2450L V2. 10 / 20 1.7 Ghz. 2.1 Ghz. 25 Mb. 60w.
Xeon E5-2450 V2. 8 / 16 2.5 Ghz. 3.3 Ghz. 20 Mb. 95W.
Xeon E5-2470 V2. 10 / 20 2.4 Ghz. 3.2 Ghz. 25 Mb. 95W.

What prospects have a socket now

Unfortunately, it looks like all the stones blocked the multiplier, which is practically depriving the possibility of overclocking. However, the models with the highest frequency may well be considered an initial game solution. Processors with 8 and 10 cores, but the low frequency is well suited for work.

Three-channel DDR3 memory will make it approaching the speed to the initial two-channel DDR4. At the same time, the ECC modules DDR3 are now most beneficial for the price.

The main problem is now in the absence of high-quality motherboards, but you can hope that the Chinese will quickly deploy production, as it was with a socket 2011. The first Chinese boards are already on sale.

Small outcome

Apparently, we have a simplified option of the 2011 socket.

Benefits:

  • Cheap processors and RAM
  • Three-channel memory
  • Budget gaming assembly will be cheaper than on LGA2011

Disadvantages:

  • Motherboards are small and they are quite expensive
  • Not all processor models can be easily found on sale.
  • No stones with unlocked multiplier, there is practically no overclocking
  • Less space for further upgrade

xeon-E5450.ru.

Intel processors. Productivity rating in the LGA1151 platform

This article will consider the most actual Intel processors. The rating of their performance, presented below, will indicate the belonging of a particular model to a certain niche of the semiconductor chip market.

Celeron is the least productive desktop processors Intel. The rating of their performance indicates that they are perfectly suitable only for use in office computing systems that are able to solve only the most simple tasks: text and tabular programs, viewing sites, playback of multimedia and reading books in electronic form.

This family of chips owns 3 models: G3930T, G3930 and G3950. The key difference between them is the value of the clock frequency. The younger model functions by 2.7 GHz, the average - by 2, GHz and the older - by 3.0 GHz. Among other features of this CPU series, it is necessary to note the presence of 2 computing modules and the third-level cache for 2 MB. The price of younger models is 42 dollars, and on the older - 52.

Average level

Pentium and Core i3 are average in terms of performance and cost of Intel processors. The rating of these semiconductor solutions indicates their similar affiliation. Chips "Pentium" are marked with G45xx or G46xx. The initial clock frequency of them is 2.9 GHz, and the maximum is 3.7 GHz. Higher speed, compared with the Celeron series CPU, is ensured by the increased value of the clock frequency, an increased third-level cache to 3 MB and support for NT technology.

The presence of the latter allows these chips to handle software in 4 streams. Core i3 chips are designated 71xx and 73xx. The difference from the younger family in this case is the amount of 3 level cache, which is equal to 4MB.

High-performance chips

The Intel's high-performance kernel consists of four physical code processing units. The CPU family belongs to the chips I5 and, of course, I7. In the first case, semiconductor solutions are marked with 7400, 7500 and 7600. The cache at the third level they have 6 MB. Support for Turbobust is also implemented, due to which the chip frequency is dynamically regulated. The difference between I7 from I5 consists of an increased cache at the third level to 8 MB and support for NT. That is, i7 is able to work with the program code in 8 threads. As a result, the last CPU family in tests has a 15 percent increase in productivity.

Assembling your own PC is not easy. The user has to face a huge number of problems, especially if he did not figure it out in the process itself. The fact is that the most important factor for stable operation of the system is compatibility. Not everyone knows and thinks about it, therefore, there are various kinds of failures in the work of PC.

Connector (Socket)

Before dealing with the Socket 1151 processor, it is necessary in principle to understand what the connector is and how the processor itself works.

So, in front of you the motherboard to install the chip. Whatever the processor you cannot buy, because it should be compatible primarily with the connector on the motherboard. Therefore, it is necessary to initially take into account this parameter and follow it.

The connector of the central processor can be socket or slot. It is located on the motherboard and is designed to install directly the processor itself.

Previously, many chips were embarrassed into the motherboard, but such a technology was now no longer anywhere, since many users are aimed at constant modernization of the system, and without removable components it is impossible to do it.

Connectors differ not only symbol and at the physical level: have different sizes, quantities or types of contacts, as well as a different mounting for coolers.

A variety of sockets

Now a huge number of sockets are already available to install processors. This is not surprising, as dozens of new models are released annually on the market, and this is only from Intel. Each of them requires a certain design, and accordingly its shape and dimensions are changed, which affects the type of socket.

Earlier in the Intel family, there was a simplified designation of the connectors: from Socket 1 to Socket 7. Now these are outdated types, so they are not used in modern systems.

With the active start of development of processors, both active work began on the possibility of modernizing systems. So began to appear new sockets that worked with the Pentium, Xeon family, etc.

Each of them had a designation that was no longer tied to order. For example, Socket 8 followed by Socket 370, etc. The Socket H Connectors were followed by the most popular ruler.

Socket 1151 processor

This connector was specially developed by Intel for its products. He appeared back in 2015, but still remains relevant, despite the fact that Socket 2066 appeared after it.

Works socket with processors on the Kaby Lake, Skylake architecture, Coffee Lake. He came to the LGA 1050 shift, as technology demanded changes.

Features socket

Intel Socket 1151 processors need a special corresponding connector, which has 1151 spring-loaded contact. Thus, chips can be installed due to the corresponding contact sites.

Such a connector also affects the characteristics of the motherboard, and therefore the choice of other components. For example, almost all motherboards with Socket 1151 work only with a two-channel standard for connecting RAM-type DDR4.

When choosing a processor on Socket 1151, it is also necessary to take into account the presence of DMI 3.0 interfaces, PCI Express 3.0, etc., despite changes in the connector itself, the fastening of the processor cooler has not changed, so it can be transferred from the motherboard based on Socket 1150.

Innovation

In the summer of 2017, it was announced that new processors on the CoFee Lake architecture do not work with the motherboard on a socket 1151. It turned out that the presence of the 300th series chipset is important for their correct work. It turned out that the new socket has an identical number of spring-loaded contacts and even identical keys, but electrically incompatible with new boards.

Processors on the Socket 1151, which worked on the Kaby Lake and Skylake architecture, cannot work in a pair with the 300th chipset. But followed by refutation from the children from China, who decided to experiment with the innovation.

As a result, they reflash the BIOS microcode, after which the 7th generation of processors easily worked paired with the Z370 chipset. True with one embassy: The built-in video card and the PCI Express processor port refused to work.

Such an innovation led to the fact that the compatibility of processors on Socket 1151 in the people was divided into two versions V1 and V2. The most interesting thing is that these versions are now absolutely incompatible. If you have to choose a processor, you will have to check with a list of supported connectors.

How to check compatibility

In order not to make a mistake in buying an Intel Core processor on Socket 1151, you will have to do a thorough check. You need to know the manufacturer of the motherboard and its model. If you do not have a box, you can learn this using the CPU-Z program, which provides almost all the information about your system.

Next, go to any search engine and enter the data obtained. In this case, the user will be offered the manufacturer's website of the motherboard, on which all the detailed information about the device is displayed.

Suitable processors

What processors are suitable for Socket 1151 of the first version? This includes models of the Celeron, Pentium, Core i3, Core i5 and Core i7. By the way, the same for the second version of the socket.

In this case, there is one feature that will help you when buying Core i3 and higher chip. If you see the first digit "7" model in the name of the model and below, then these processors refer to the first version, which is compatible with old motherboards. If the first number "8" or "9" name is the new generation of Coffee Lake, which requires new Motherworks of the 300th series.

For example, the first version of Socket 1151 includes Core i3 7350K, Core i5 7600K or Core i7 7700K. In this case, the second version of Socket 1151 can include the model Core i3 8350k, Core i5 8600K and Core i7 9700K.

The Core i9 and Xeon and Xeon processors are also working with motherboards of the 300th series - these are the last very powerful and productive chips that have entered the market.

Popular presented Socket 1151

Since to afford the processors of the 8th and 9th generation can not all now, there are no models that would have gained crazy popularity. What you can not say about simpler, but no less powerful Socket 1151 V1 versions.

In the Skylake family, the bright representative was Intel i5 6400T. This processor under Socket 1151 is now eclipsed by other models, but at the time of its release it has become a really interesting solution for the low cost. He offered 4 cores with a frequency of up to 2800 MHz, as well as a low heat supply room of 35 W.

In Kaby Lake, Intel Pentium G4620 became such a hero. Almost everyone who tried to collect the budget Gamer PC heard about him. The model has become a cult, offered the Intel Core I3 7100 functions, but had a much low cost.

In the same family, the I5 7400 and the top version of i7 7700K were not bad. The latter by the way is still interesting to many players.

Coffee Lake is the best I5 8400. This is a representative of Socket 1151 V2, so he brought with him innovations, and it is not only about new motherboards. Together with it, 2 additional kernels were available, automatic frequency increase and stable operation.

Cooling system

The cooler for the processor under Socket 1151, as already mentioned, did not change with nothing since the time the mount was decided to leave the same thing, so no changes regarding this sphere touched. In addition, most new processors come along with their native cooler, which in any case is suitable for the motherboard.

If you want to buy a separate cooling system, which would better cope with maintaining the desired processor temperature, then you will have to carefully study the offer offers. However, most chips have a clear description and parameters, thanks to which you can decide on the choice and purchase the right cooler.

conclusions

So, at this point, Socket 1151 is a popular processor connector, which employs many top processors. In 2017, he acquired his second version, which was incompatible with the innovations of the Coffee Lake family. Thus, Socket 1151 V1 and V2 appeared in domestic online stores. Despite the differences, Socket 1151 allows you to install the same cooler on the motherboard, since the mount did not change.

To easier to distinguish, which processor is suitable for this connector, it suffices to look at the family: Kaby Lake, Skylake, Coffee Lake. The first two families refer to the first version of the socket, the third to the second. In this way, you can define compatibility by name: Look at the first digit of the model, if it is "7" and below, it means that the first version, if "8" and above - the second. Nevertheless, when buying is better to recheck on the manufacturer's website, the correctness of the parameters.

Despite this, some enthusiasts still managed to reunite non-compatible processors. But, as a rule, at the same time they lose some of their options, which is naturally not very well reflected in their work.

  • Effect of RAM on system performance
  • Introduction

    It is difficult to argue that the growing dollar rate was seriously affected by buyers of computer components, because in just a year of the "hardware" rose in price by 30-60%. What makes manufacturers attached, what steps are made to hold positions in the market? Who reacted faster to the unfavorable situation suddenly? Answer these questions will be easier if you look at the situation as a whole.

    advertising

    The trios of the most massive suppliers of motherboards are ASRock, Asus and MSI, the market share of which almost reaches 70%. And the most tasty part of the cake is the segment of solutions for the Intel Skylake CPU - thanks to the fresh processors, the probability of seduce buyers is growing. But if earlier users forgot the poles of Intel and during the transition from one type of CPU to another, the platforms changed, now the people have become leaning.

    Of course, technology does not stand still, but this time instead of one plum step we received only his likeness. For example, try to find five differences between the system boards of the previous generation and the current one. Yes, new models are equipped with USB 3.1, M.2 or U2 connectors, but without them you could collect a good computer. Why then take an expensive motherboard, if you can do the version more modest? Perhaps your weight word will say overclocking? And here Intel tried to overlap the oxygen as much as possible to buyers.

    Manufacturers, seeing a decline in consumer demand, began to introduce new opportunities, including undocumented. But after that Intel, the principles of segmentation of their products in Absolut elevated - if desired, it is now unable to disperse only the CPU, also the motherboard based on Intel Z170 is needed. And there is no doubt that under the onslaught vendor, manufacturers will sooner or later remove the possibility of overclocking processors without the "K" index. Apparently, it is now important not to miss the moment, choose something suitable among hundreds of motherboards and stop updating the BIOS.

    The mentioned Trinity also did not sit back and gradually ranked Russian retail more accessible models. And almost all of everyone has already been told earlier in a series of materials, broken through the sets of system logic:

    • Budget options on Intel H110;
    • Available models and solutions class above on Intel B150;

    Hello, technoblog readers. Today I will tell you which processors are suitable under Sotet 1151 (Skylake, Kaby Lake), as well as 1151V2 (Coffee Lake). In this article, we will try to tell about the most powerful, inexpensive and cheap Intel Core, Pentium and Celeron chips.

    The list of CPU will be built as a list so that you have a more accurate view of the models presented in the market.

    And yes, it is worth making an important refinement: Socket LGA1151 does not imply reverse compatibility with 1150 and does not support Xeon server processors.

    Table compatibility table

    Socket 1151 from Intel is very cunning in essence, because it has 2 versions: the first supports the chips of the 6th and 7th generations, and the second is only the 8th. With respect to the picture it is much easier to make up, but it's not about him.
    Let's see what, as well as I3, I7, Pentium and Celeron are able to work at 1151 Gen 1.
    Now consider the line of chips that are suitable for the motherboard with a socket 1151v2.
    In 2018, the 9th generation CPU was added to the previous list.

    Optimal processor for its value

    And now the most interesting part of the comparison. We designated which processor is suitable for a specific socket. Now it remains to decide on the model of the chip itself. If you want to learn more about the CPU - we recommend reading this article.
    And now we will go through the most vivid representatives of 6.7 and 8th generations:

    Skylake. - Intel i5 6400T engineering sample. At one time, this processor has made a lot of noise, because possessed extremely low cost, 4 productive cores with a frequency of up to 2.8 GHz and a very modest heat pump of 35 W.

    Kaby Lake - Intel Pentium G4620. The so-called "hyperpen" has become cult, among gamers at the time of the exit, since he offered the Intel Core i3-7100 functionality at a significantly lower cost. It is also worth mentioning the vigorous middling I5-7400 and the top version of i7-7700K, in which 4 kernels and 8 data processing threads. Stone and to this day is considered a relevant, powerful and interesting solution for progressive systems, and also supports acceleration up to 5 GHz on the factor.

    Coffee. Lake - I5-8400. The appearance of the 8th generation of Intel chips added not only a new socket, but also 2 additional kernels of each line, with the exception of Celeron and Pentium. Have a 6-nuclear processor that can automatically increase the frequency from 2.8 to 4 GHz - a very successful contribution to the future and therefore I bold it recommended it (at the prices of I5 you can navigate this (especially, many of this discounter is well known as reliable and Verified seller)).

    Difference between1151 and 1151.v2.

    It is not a secret for a long time that the processor connector intended for sets of system logic of the 100th and 200th series is absolutely not compatible with the 300th. And the point is not even that Intel wants to earn more money. The introduction of additional cores forced engineers in the root to recycled Coffee Lake processors to ensure the stable operation of chips, even under extremal acceleration.
    Key changes affected VCC and VSS (Earth) contact sites. At the same time, the number of previously reserved RSVD contacts has decreased. Thus, the situation is as follows:

    Skylake / Kaby Lake Coffee Lake
    VCC. 110 128
    VSS. 364 378
    RSVD. 46 25

    As you can see, "make friends" old chips with new motherboards are physically impossible, like a chinese plug into a European outlet. Yes, there are enthusiasts that managed to start the Kaby Lake on the Z370 by modifying the BIOS, however, the lion's share of functions in this case worked unstable, and the rest was completely absent.

    So if you have a lot of time free time - you can try, but I strongly do not recommend this.

    I hope that the article was useful to you, so comment, share with loved ones. See you in new articles. Until.

    An old tradition was acquainted with the possibilities of any new platform on the example of the top processors of the K-sedition, and there was no exception with the LGA1151. Core i5-6600K and I7-6700K are already tested in a variety of "poses" by the majority of publications, including. Actually, the Intel policy to promote new solutions has it precisely to such development: firstly, it is to-modify processors that apply among the browsers, and secondly, "ordinary" models are also issued with some delay relative to the "tops" of families. If you go down below the Core i5 in the "table of ranks", then there sometimes should pass for several months to collect the entire product range - for example, Celeron under the LGA1151 will have to wait until the new year. And sometimes not all possible modifications of processors appear on the market - so, Broadwell desktop models are practically no. Dual-core - no, although in the mobile segment it is from them all last fall and began.

    But Skylake is designed for massive presence on the market, it is not limited only to part of the segments, like Broadwell (by the way, this happens far from the first time - simply and Ivy Bridge, and Haswell were also massive, so many began to forget the times of Sandy Bridge and earlier microarchitectures). With regard to desktop systems, this means that slowly but steadily the LGA1150 platform will be supplemented by the LGA1151 platform. This does not mean, of course, the components of the first platform will instantly disappear from retail chains, however ... It is enough to look at the commodity residues of the LGA1155, which only two and a half years ago was the main: system fee at least an average level (not to mention High) today you can purchase except that in the secondary market, and there is only a wide selection of processors only there. Accordingly, in order not to be in a couple of years in a similar situation, if necessary, repair and / or modernization, it makes sense now, other things being equal, it is equal to acquire a newer decision. The only thing that can prevent this is the presence of a large amount of DDR3 memory (if necessary, this is quite possible with the LGA1156 or an older platform, but, as we have already found out, the desire to use DDR3 in the new platform does not lead, but Suitable boards are on sale. Another question is that with time DDR3 risks repeat the DDR2 fate, which is on sale, but it is now twice as expensive than DDR3 / DDR4, so in order not to get to a dead end (again - if necessary, repair or modernization), better if necessary With the "old" memory still not to contact.

    In general, the time passes when the LGA1151 was just a hot novelty and the subject for theoretical discussions - the usual labor weekdays of the buyer begin. Accordingly, it comes time to test the usual mass models of processors: after all, the segment of processors with CRP above $ 200 accounts for literally 3% of sales, and it includes both all Core i7 and older Core i5. However, the older Core I5 \u200b\u200bfall into it the most edge, so also interesting - especially the Core i5-6600, from the point of view of the buyer who does not plan to accelerate anything, almost identical I5-6600K for the main characteristics (which is not at all like the situation in the top segment where i7-6700 and i7-6700k simply do not intersect in clock frequencies). We have already been tested the most affordable quad-core processor, but there are also "intermediate" i5-6500. In general, it is time to learn all the family (so far without models with TDP 35 W) than we today and we will deal with.

    Configuration of test posted stands

    CPUIntel Core i5-6400.Intel Core i5-6500Intel Core i5-6600Intel Core i5-6600K.
    Name nucleusSkylake.Skylake.Skylake.Skylake.
    Technology pr-va14 nm14 nm14 nm14 nm
    Std / Max kernel frequency, GHz2,7/3,3 3,2/3,6 3,3/3,9 3,5/3,9
    Number of kernels / streams4/4 4/4 4/4 4/4
    Cache L1 (sums.), I / D, KB128/128 128/128 128/128 128/128
    Cache L2, KB4 × 256.4 × 256.4 × 256.4 × 256.
    Cache L3 (L4), MIB6 6 6 6
    RAM 2 × DDR4-21332 × DDR4-21332 × DDR4-21332 × DDR4-2133
    TDP, W.65 65 65 91
    GraphicsHDG 530.HDG 530.HDG 530.HDG 530.
    Number of EU24 24 24 24
    STD / MAX frequency, MHz350/950 350/1050 350/1150 350/1150
    PriceT-12873939.T-12873965T-12874017.T-12794521.

    So, at the moment, Intel offers customers of seven Core i5 models under LGA1151, and all of them are quad-core processors, even in the T-family of dual-core no longer - for the first time they remained only among laptop processors, and there and there are for the first time two quad-core Core i5 . In principle, it is not surprising - as we see, and the heat pump of "ordinary" processors is reduced to 65 W, which was once a standard only for dual-core processors, and then not everyone was fitted. Above such a "revolution", the company began to work at the time of Ivy Bridge, but then it turned out not very, and in Haswell at all I had to "retreat" to the usual position. Now the process ended: only "overclocker" models live above 65 W.

    What else is interesting? Fighting frequencies are funny: 6400 and 6500 distinguishes as much as 500 MHz, and 6500 and 6600 are only 100. At the same time, the maximum frequency in TURBO Boost mode is a flat line with a step of 300 MHz, which is perhaps more important because at this frequency some The kernels sometimes work, but on the starting - never (with Turbo Boost enabled, of course). Most likely, in practice, the maximum frequency will be evenly achieved or not achieved by everyone, so the processors will be lined up in a flat lineup of performance. But we are just today and check.

    CPUIntel Core i5-3570Intel Core i5-4460Intel Core i5-4690k.
    Name nucleusIvy Bridge.Haswell.Haswell.
    Technology pr-va22 nm22 nm22 nm
    Std / Max kernel frequency, GHz3,4/3,8 3,2/3,4 3,5/3,9
    Number of kernels / streams4/4 4/4 4/4
    Cache L1 (sums.), I / D, KB128/128 128/128 128/128
    Cache L2, KB4 × 256.4 × 256.4 × 256.
    Cache L3 (L4), MIB6 6 6
    RAM2 × DDR3-1600.2 × DDR3-1600.2 × DDR3-1600.
    TDP, W.77 84 88
    GraphicsHDG 2500.HDG 4600.HDG 4600.
    Number of EU6 20 20
    STD / MAX frequency, MHz650/1150 350/1200 350/1200
    PriceT-7959562.T-10820134.T-10887398.

    Who to compare with? First, we need younger and eldest Haswell. The youngest (I5-4430) for sale for a long time is not visible for a long time, so there is no longer testing it, but 4460 is a very popular model, since it is cheap (and for the year from the moment of its appearance this quality began to be valued much more than before ). Well, let's take the eldest Core i5-4690k, which we, by the way, even with 6600K compared only in a pair with a discrete video card, and now it's time to evaluate them in more often in practice conditions. However, specifically for the K-family, maybe not more often, but 4690k has a complete analogue without unlocked multipliers. Analogue is completely complete: with the same frequencies and even the TDP of the same level (the difference is only 4 W). From the point of view of the search for Holy Grail, such as studying "pure progress", it would be worthy of, of course, test the S-modifications of processors, but from a practical point of view it is not interesting. The buyer is important what you can just buy (with the same costs), and the heat pump in the usual modular desktop, at least the MINI-ITX format has no significant value. In Intel considered it possible to make it regularly tougher? So, if it affects productivity, the company itself is to blame :)

    In principle, when looking from the buyer of these two processors is enough. Why not require Core i5-5675c? This is already well-studied model, the strengths and weaknesses of which are well known: the processor with the most powerful in its class integrated graphics, but more expensive than any secret Haswell and Skylake, obviously is a niche solution: it only needs a "hunting" for a powerful GPU . If there is such a need, then the alternatives have no i5-5675c, but if it is not (and there is, for example, the desire to save, or is planned to use a discrete video card at least in the future), then I5-5675C is not needed. In any case, the direct competitor of Core i5 processors under LGA1151 is not.

    But Core i5-3570, like some other senior models under LGA1155, is. Of course, in case such a system already has and works, the issue of competition is deprived of meaning: as we have repeatedly wrote, upgrading the working system with the processor of this class on LGA1150 or LGA1151 with a similar thing - there is no point. Yes, weak graphics, but this problem is easier to solve the discrete. But if "at hand" has a computer with a junior processor for LGA1155, which for one or another reasons "is not enough", then the question arises: to change the processor only or go to a new platform? A particularly attractive second option begins to look, if "not enough" is not only a processor. It is clear that "complete modernization" is conjugate with great inconvenience, and it will be tritely more expensive, but suddenly this option will be more attractive from the point of view of performance? Especially since the old (and slow) processor is already difficult to sell separately, but along with the motherboard and memory it is simpler: they will buy them, who else has not been. In general, since we have the opportunity to compare new Core i5 (including younger) with the old, but one of the best in your class - we will do it.

    As for other testing conditions, they were equal, but not the same: the frequency of operational memory was maximum supported by specifications. But its volume (8 GB) and the system drive (TOSHIBA ThnSnH256GMCT with a capacity of 256 GB) were the same for all subjects.

    Testing technique

    For performance evaluation, we used our performance measurement methodology using benchmarks and IXBT Game Benchmark 2015. All test results in the first benchmark We were normalized regarding the results of the reference system, which this year will be the same for laptops, and for all other computers, which is designed to facilitate readers a difficult comparison and choice work:

    iXBT Application Benchmark 2015

    As it has already been said more than once, this group of applications is highly dependent on the GPU, so that only HD Graphics 2500 Core i5 is a clear outsider: 6 EU Gen7 is very small. Alas, but in those days, the "full-fledged" video frame was guaranteed only laptop models, and in the desktop segment - all Core i7, but only a few models of other families. There is no such problem in Haswell, since simplified GPUs remained only in Celeron and Pentium with all the resulting. Skylake is even better, but not much, although the number sometimes already goes into quality - so the "middle pepper" i5-6500 already overtakes the top i5-4690k. But it concerns this not only GPU, by the way. As we already know, installing a discrete video card based on the Radeon R7 260x to the system on Core i5-3570 speeds up the work almost one and a half times, but it only ultimately catch up with an I5-4690K with an integrated video. And 4690k with the same R7 260X in turn becomes faster than i5-6500, but still lags behind I5-6600. So an approach: " what is your integral me? I will buy a quick discrete and overtaking»Well works except in toys :)

    What else is interesting, the processors under the LGA1151 lined up in a smooth line, despite the "insane jumps" of the starting frequency - as we warned, it does not matter. A 6600 is almost equal to 6600K. In the future, it will repeat more than once, so we will already do without comment.

    As you can see, even now, when processing video, it is not always possible to extract from OpenCL such a significant benefit, as on the first diagram (however, work on the new version of the test method has shown that the software update and in this group allows you to change a bit, but about it It is too early to talk in detail), so sometimes the video card can be neglected. But it is not the only advantage of Skylake above Haswell, so here already from 4690k almost on the equal "comes" and 6500.

    It is noteworthy that, despite several different "preferences" of the programs included in this group, the result turns out to be similar to those obtained in the previous one. And from the repeatability it follows that it is unlikely to be something special :)

    But not necessarily - as we have already written more than once, Adobe regularly releases new versions of this program, but the approach to its optimization does not change for five years for a minimum. Accordingly, everything that needs here is one or two high-frequency kernels and nothing else. From this point of view, new processors are not better than old processors, so the productivity is concerned. We also note that this is one of the few cases when the performance of 6600 and 6600K differs noticeably. The reason is simple - with uniform loading there is no difference, the clock frequency of the cores used as the "phenomenon are over" or achieved by Turbo Boost, but when the load "jumps", an economical processor with a long frequency range sometimes to increase the frequency simply "does not have time." From the point of view of energy saving, this approach is useful - once it was possible to perform some kind of work quickly even without increasing the frequency and supply voltage, this is good. But on the performance, as we see, it affects not the best way.

    What Audtion Despite the regular (before) optimization behaves sometimes very similar to Illustrator, we also noted more than once. In this case, we have an intermediate between "good" and "bad": 6600 and 6600K here are approximately equal, but 4690k is still lagging behind them. No, in general, "convincing superiority" of a new family.

    The recognition of the text is obviously the case when even if you wish, do not "match." Except that the multithreading can be disposed of more fully, but it does not matter when comparing the processors of one class, it does not have (they are all four cores four), and the graphics core if it is put on the service to people, it is clearly not now. We are instead of 4690k 4690s (which on TDP is just much more like new Core i5) - it could get better. But since Intel believes that all processors can be limited to 65 W, it means that newcomers have to act in inconvenient conditions without any discount on the latter.

    Although sometimes they need it very much - in this case, it turns out something similar to parity already and "at both ends of the range", which in our opinion is even worse than when older models are not much faster than their predecessors.



    And in these cases - it is. Although from the point of view of functionality in terms of supporting various high-speed drives, a new platform is much better than the immediate predecessor, not to mention the LGA1155, it does not always affect the performance accordingly. With the same drive, but different processors it may be different. Actually, why we prefer from these tests not to refuse - in the end, this is what in practice any user of a real computer is facing, where the processor does not work at all in a spherical vacuum.

    What come to the end? In principle, Core i5's performance has not changed and does not change for a long time - just all models in the family with each generation begin to work a little faster. Radically increase productivity. It is possible for increasing the clock frequencies, but they have long been kept at the same level (more precisely, in the same range), increasing only in dual-core models or in processors for laptops. However, the development of 14 Nm of the technical process made it possible to increase frequencies and quad-core Core i5 with TDP 65 W, but in parallel they were the main ones in the Intel's assortment, and earlier the "basic" turned out to be completely different heat boosters. Actually, one thing to another and exchanged.

    Gaming applications

    For obvious reasons, we are limited to computer systems of such a level, we are limited to a minimum quality mode, and not only in the "full" resolution, but also with its decrease to 1366 × 768: despite the obvious progress in the field of integrated graphics, it is not yet able to satisfy the demanding to Quality of the picture of the gamer. And we decided not to check the Core i5-3570 at all on the standard game set: it is obvious that those owners who use the integrated video card, the games are not interested in the word at all. It is enough to remember that the Pentium G2130 turned out to be unable to cope with any game from our set, except without WOT, but its GPU is exactly equal to the HDG 2500. Yes, and the best in Ivy Bridge HDG 4000, too, not enough stars from the sky, so And you can no longer remember about it, not to mention the younger IGP models in processors for this platform platform. Here are newer something can. So let's see what.

    As you can see, they begin somewhere where Haswell ends. Differences, however, are mostly quantitative, but they are within the line: 4460 and 4690k can be considered even the same, but in the 6x00 runtime clock frequencies differ already by 200 MHz with a larger number of EU, which together with different heat pumps and Different performance of the processor part already leads to the apparent effect.

    WOT is undemanding to the chart so much that here in practice permission can not be reduced, but to play in full, so this is this mode. In which the i5-6400 is already faster than any processors under the LGA1150, and the 6600K shows the same frame rate as 4690K in low resolution.

    In Grid2, again, the main "breakthrough" in FHD. Due to not only a change in quantitative characteristics, but also internal changes in the graphics core (formally it is one and a half generation, while with the Ivy Bridge to Haswell changed only half of it), but the main result - one and a half - twice, which will already clearly abandon From the minimum quality settings and improve the picture.

    In principle, Core i5 for the LGA1150 has already been minimally suitable for this game (albeit only in low resolution), but on the background of LGA1151 this result is somehow lost: even I5-6400 at least a little, but faster, and senior models are already unconditionally Suitable.

    The older game of the series is more demanding on the performance of the processor part, which in conditions of a limited thermal package affects a negative way. However, with the exception of I5-6400, we see the results of the same level with low resolution and greater performance in FHD. It is a pity that there is still insufficient for the game, although ... although it is possible in practice and permission to intermediate choose, for example, so that the improvements in the graphic part are not at least not useless.

    Returning to "good" cases. Without quality changes (for HD, there was enough, in FHD and now there is little), but with pleasant quantitative.

    In FHD, performance is still too low, but in HD-resolution, gradually approach the "playability" border. At least approaching - on the LGA1150 before it was too far. Unless, of course, consider solely Haswell - I5-5675C, for example, already enough for somehow play, but this is a special story.

    Quad-core processors and previously coped with this game in full resolution, but completely without productivity. Now he began to appear. What is funny, the frequency of frames in the case of senior models is almost the same as the AMD A8 processors provide. It is clear that they are cheaper, but also performance in general-purpose programs are also different. But such an eternal advantage of AMD, like higher game performance, begins to gradually dissolve, for which processors with GT3E are not always required.



    However, it's not everywhere everywhere it turns out so well, but in general, there is a general productivity increase. Of course, it's not that someone from the computer users could encourage on the old platform to the upgrade - it's better to buy a discrete video card, even inexpensive: it's much more benefit and less than the right. However, the computer's buyer on a new processor for the same money will receive a little more than a year ago.

    TOTAL

    The state of affairs in the segment of processors for desktop computers has long been depressing enthusiasts. Honestly, and we are to some extent too: the easiest way to write about radical improvements - for example, about the appearance of Core 2 in 2006 or Sandy Bridge in 2011. Then everything was simple and clear: the novelties are definitely better than the predecessors in all respects and in all areas of application. However, it is obvious that these "revolutions" were not so much nascent in the Sector of the Desktop "Persons", as they were a reflection of the processes occurring in the mobile computers market (Core 2 in general was the heir to laptop Core Duo). But then practical benefits from new approaches and technologies and all other, and now changes are clearly not to improve the service of lovers large dusty boxes. Rather, even on the contrary: reduction of cooling requirements is a clear step towards manufacturers of compact systems, but it is no less clearly affected by potential performance. However, it is easy to see that the increase in the performance of the processor cores has long been stopped long ago, the increase in their number - all the more, and what is really becoming more powerful and more powerful (i.e. processor graphic), a lover is not needed to play on a large desktop computer.

    In general, it can be stated that the new platform is the same as old but more than the best. A little more productive, a little functional, but does not differ in principle. On the other hand, this is not required: so far new needs will appear in the mass segment (such as there were multimedia technologies or 3D games in the year before last, for example), no significant increase in computing capacities is needed. In principle, everyone who wanted to buy a desktop computer has already done. And if it occurs sometimes to change (due to failure, for example), it is quite suitable as it was. So far it turns out that the new computer will be at least a bit, but better than the old one. But only a little. Times, when in three or five years in the market could be changed, everything was left only in oral legends (however, if it's good to look at the history, they never happened).