Brakes on the file database - how to avoid (from recent experience). Brakes on the file database - how to avoid (from recent experience) failed to block the Config 1C table

8.1 Kit for 5 users.
Yuzai typical accounting.
Work mainly through the terminal, sometimes without it.
Database Variant - File
Errors are seen from those in the terminal

something like this. It rummaged in nete, Yandex - in general, somehow it is non-specific everything.
Main recommendations found:
1) unload / download the database - in the sense of a new one to concrete from the configurator
2) Run \\ Propogram Files \\ 1CV81 \\ Bin \\ CHDBFL.EXE - Checking the physical integrity of the base
3) Testing and fixing the information base
4) Updated on the last release 8.1

Does anyone know something more specifically?

13.5.2010, 10:05

All you need, you have already offered, first try it. There is no physical errors on the carrier?
More specific to whether anyone will say.

13.5.2010, 10:56

So this ... If we consider whatever 1s, and in general, then stupid some of two places try to block one table, the first has time, and the rest are sent. See what operations / transactions / processing (or as it is called in 1C) are performed at this time. It may well be that the point is not in the platform, but crookedly written configurations or especially the work of these configurations on your data.

P.S. A file database in multiplayer mode is a perversion.

13.5.2010, 10:58

Although hell knows him like 1C-in database, it may well be that somewhere in the database la and all sorts of repayers will help.

13.5.2010, 11:06

Yes, it gives me, the eighth as a platform - the dampness is still. Somewhere wrote that periodically testing with correction has to do

13.5.2010, 11:10

unlikely. For the eight, a new server bought as much with licensed window

The bottom line is that one blocks the table, the rest are waiting for a timeout.
Why do not have time, this is a big question. Physical media look, may be tupit. System Journal, MHDD. And all the actions that are written in the first post must.

P.S. New does not mean that 100% working.

13.5.2010, 11:38

All you need, you already offered, first try it

so yes, it is necessary to wait until the evening.
Was a little hope something new to hear

Do not tell wonders. There is enough trouble, but it is not them.

where is the wonders? I did not understand, someone got on say that 8.1 is a cool impeccable platform?

wrote that periodically testing with correction have to do

we seem to have such a case.
A survey of users in a single way (so as not to rotate) showed that this situation seems to be just like users working in the terminal. And those who do not go through the terminal on which
Windows Server 2003 R2 Standart 64, or do not remember such a situation, or it simply did not arise from them.
And two especially observant noted that 1.5-2 months ago, this phenomenon was observed much less

13.5.2010, 12:42

Born Killer., What a thread antiviro stands on the server? If yes, try to disable or base in exceptions

13.5.2010, 13:14

What a thread antiviro stands on the server?

xs, you have to look. This is an enemy Servak
sunrustic franks one of our databases took on service, rooted their server, and such as they oversee our work
access to their server was provided, but in a trimmed version.
See.

no, it looks like an antivirus ...

13.5.2010, 13:23

I did not understand, someone got on say that 8.1 is a cool impeccable platform?
yes, nah. 7.7 THAT LAGE PRESENTS TO YEAR, but about 8-ku, to put legends about her buggy

How much database size and how many users?

Fit. Give a specific example.
How much database size and how many users?

at night, the tester did and correct. Prior to this, 1CV8.1CD was 2GB, now 1.5GB became.
Users 5 pieces, as well as a license.
As for the legend about the glu, there was one case. Here if you take 7.7 and just through the total, copy 1 database to another place - a copy without problems.
Once I tried to do the same with the eight database, I copied the database catalog to another place,
prescribed, opened both bases at the same time, one was assumed for perversions.
In the copy marked for deletion of several documents, switched to the window with a real base did not believe the eyes: the same documents were marked for removal and there


Ash stump, 1c on everything has an answer: make a daily copy of the database.
Yes, only this Hu is a new answer.

MMMARINA

Born Killer.,

hello Friend...

Myth!
Here are the legends ...

hello Friend...

hi friend. Here you are listed

And then smashed icons on the desktop

Myth!
Here are the legends ...

i saw it. I am not ridiculous then it was to distinguish the documents from the removal unwanted after removing the removal, they all become unnewned.

i do not remember which platform was then stood.

try to do as well. Maybe you get

Here are the legends ...

i will say more: when I manually removed the pair of documents to remove the details,
in the real base, the same thing happened. I was not to me to somehow document this sensation.
So I just returned everything as it was, and did not do it anymore

eliminate the gaping holes in the knowledge of the computer ...
true, in my opinion, I am hopeless ...

specifically, this topic is not at all for you, native (c)
in general, everything is amenable to understanding
prevent a friend of the computer, as an option)))

In the copy marked for deletion of several documents, switched to the window with a real base did not believe the eyes: the same documents were marked for removal and there Shok.gif

That is never a file base that neither copied the 8th
It was not a sensation.

You can damn you can not believe, but it was.

The fact is that with the 8th, a few years worked very tight. As soon as they were not copied. So I can not believe
But I can assume that when the person is overwhelmed - it is possible. I know about yourself.

Do not worry, the file base can be calmly copied and lifted in any other revenge. There should be no glitches.

14.5.2010, 10:52

14.5.2010, 11:28

There is a prolonged-in the reservoir prescribed the same base 2 times

8-ka offers to replace

14.5.2010, 11:31

she ... 7.7 When trying to do it stupidly silent and the database does not add to the list (it just does not react in any way)
8-ka offers to replace

We can just missed the mouse and launched the same thing ... After all, it does not happen

14.5.2010, 11:47

We can just miss the mouse and launched one and the same ...

i'll try to simulate something like this. Then accomplish your goal.
Usually before any dangerous action, I am in 1C (7.7. Or 8-ke) aim to sign a question (there the path to the database is shown).

Here the people are so friendly my legend on laughter raised that I was doubted.
Although glitches in the eight more than in the seven.

Oh, here's a stop glitch, it saw not only me.
In general, they mocked over the same 8th base of the client when I worked in Franceik.
One day one person, the other - the second, on the third I went. I asked them - we did a regatta copy before the exploits? In response - Rzut, like horses, scored shorter, only they took the base on that car

14.5.2010, 12:35

- Rzut, like horses, scored shorter, only they took the base locally,
and I fell out the case from the web to fuck it. Backup, following the example of the previous Taruvish, decided not to do,
young was and stupid - a lot of ponts.
In general, I made a change in confusion, I preserve the confusion, at the time of the conservation of the confes, some accident happened, and the base fell, in the evening. Shock. In the morning I went 3 specials, including me there.
The accident was that the base was torn off the release number, i.e. In the configuration, when pressed, the question was empty there, and the name of the conference itself was absent. And when in the course of the database, there is also no shrine, the interface is inclined. Floored, it was not to go to the logs of documents.
I decided the problem by updating the killed database with a relatively fresh configuration file, everything turned out.
Everything was revived.
This is an example of a real legend. 3 people should not be buggy at the same time

14.5.2010, 13:53

at the time of preserving the confes, some accident happened, and the base fell

Well, if it was a gland glitch, then nothing surprising.
But if you found a bug, which consistently appears after the fulfillment of certain actions, then another conversation.

14.5.2010, 14:39

Well, if it was a gland glitch, then nothing surprising

xs what was. Iron, grid or platform - is not so important now.
It seems to me that Softina should not behave so much
This is the same thing to let the wist, and recognize that it is shit. How fast they are from 8.0 at 8.1 rearranged
P.S. The meaning of the word bug is clear to me, thanks for the care)))

14.5.2010, 19:37

Let's say if, when rolling service packs or something important on the same Vista there will be a similar "glitch", it is likely that the system is later, if it is loaded, it will be extremely unstable.
Or, let's say, at the time of acceptance of insulin, the Earth-Station will occur, the diabetics can give ends, because The syringe during the shaking rolled under the sofa.

14.5.2010, 22:32

Born Killer, what a thread antiviro stands on the server? If yes, try to disable or base in exceptions

How can antivirus affect the table lock ?? Base 8.x is one file.

In the copy marked for deletion of several documents, switched to the window with a real base did not believe the eyes: the same documents were marked for removal and there Shok.gif
In general, I did not like this fucking top, since then I do a copy of the base only through unload / download.
How do you sir, such a sad legend?
And if I got carried away and the fourth things did it in the copy (for example, would you delete the documents labeled for removal), and in some clear way, the same actions made mainly the database?

No, it can not be, miracles does not happen. Probably you entered the same base ... In the 8-ke, you can enter the database 2 times under one name.

periodically climbed jambs when conducting / writing documents with a case error
"Conflict blocking when performing a transaction: Failed to block the table" _Document158 "

So the first thing you need to determine which document of the metadata corresponds to the "_Document158" table. To do this, there is a global context method "Great Structural Based". So you will understand at least exactly what document "buggy".

Then you need to understand if anyone had a module in it and talked on the head, if they changed through one place. Most likely, the sets of registers records are recorded explicitly through the Write method instead of providing the platform to do it correctly. And their sequence is integrated ..
Does dedlocks do not arise?

In general, 5 people should not keep in file mode. DBMS can be free, buy only the key for the cluster server and that's it. Or is it expensive office?
I don't remember, I can not remove the technological log in the file mode or not .....

14.5.2010, 22:53

=========================================================
http://odines.ru/thread1386.html is your branch?

That is, the transaction does not pass even when one user works ?? Then the problem is probably not in the code crooked when recording movements. Because in single-user mode locks can not be. The record is consistently produced.

Then it looks like a problem in violations in the structure of the base itself ..
It is better to first perform testing and fixing the base with the "Restructuring of the Information Base Tables" flag on.
Unloading to DT with subsequent loading also makes sense ...
chdbfl.exe In this case, it is unlikely to help ... Although of course it is worth trying if the rest does not help.

Gee-current right now looked at the date of posts in the branch http://odines.ru/thread1386.html and the development of typical in a new managed mode is not far off.
And the difference between 8.2 and 8.1 is much larger than between 8.1 and 7.7 especially for developers, the brains have to be overhaul to develop under the "managed" mode of operation

Symptoms of the patient and history:

The operation of several users on the network with the same file (database) includes a network locking mechanism. This causes the system to spend precious time to identify open recording sessions, and respectively resolving conflicts.

Basic signs of blocking:

• fast work of the user with the base on the network in the monopoly mode and extremely slow - while using several users
• fast User Work with Local Base on Server and Slow - Online
• appeals to the file system just less than 10 MB / s

So, I got the task - to make so that in 1C can work three users at the same time! Funny, right?

I forgot all the jokes when I saw, something to deal with: "Server" in the face of an ordinary office computer and two laptops.

Happiness would be incomplete if it were not for wonderful operating systems - on the computer and on the same Windows 7 laptop, on the other - Windows 8.

When trying to simultaneously hold documents on laptops, one tupil is about a minute, and the second flew out of 1C with the text of the error. "Failed to block the table ...".

Launch 1C on a laptop - this is a separate show, the last order 3 minutes!

Many resources came across the Council to move to work in terminal access. Unfortunately, Windows 7 does not allow regular means to turn into a terminal server - a maximum of one active connection. At the same time, the remaining sessions are not stopped, you can reconnect under a different user - "throwing out" with the previous user, but without completing its session. Therefore, 1C should be transferred to the server OS, where there are no such restrictions. The client at his own fear and risk solved the problem instead with a third-party utilityWindows7_SP1_RDPHACK.

But on this adventure did not end. Even the terminal connection remained significant brakes. I again reversed almighty search engines. Below are the Tips on Accelerating File 1C, which I followed:

1. Disable Using a network protocol IPv6., Configure addressing on the "old" IPv4.

2. Add 1C processes to exception Windows Firewall, as well as to eliminate antivirus, or disable them at all (more risky, but a simple test showed increase speed Crouping of documents with Avast Anti-Virus disabled factor of!)

3. Run the indexation of full-text search in 1C or turn it off at all

4. Run testing and fixing the base, check the CHDBFL utility

5. Start the configuration check in the configuration (if the configuration is not typical, it can be useful). According to the results of the configuration verification, it magically decreased in size by almost a third. What and how to update the incoming programmers updated me - it was not particularly deliberate, but the fact is obvious.

6. Disable unnecessary functional options.

7. Configure rights to users. (This and previous tips seemed nonsense, until I observed for drawing controlled forms when you open the list of documents. The less excess in the controlled interface, it is usually running faster)

8. Run passing the results and recovery of the sequence (significant increase can only be in case of a long time the results were not restored)

9. Specify the "connection speed - low" in the settings of the Bases list (this is not given a special result, except for the pictures of the subsystems :))

After performing all these steps, the 1C file base earned an order of magnitude short. It began to start the maximum seconds for 10, and the rate of rearness of documents increased by an average of 12 times.

Perhaps this small article will come in handy and if you suddenly need to speed up the 1C file database.

P.S: and run the file 1c using network access to the shared folder - still unreal, because Dasha is the most smart solid-state disk, RAM and the processor will burst into network locks, and the work of more than one user will be actually impossible. This is concrete about the configuration of ut 11.1. Self-written small configurations may well work quite quickly even in the file version.

Additions from comments To publishing:

Disk Defragmenter with file base

Convolution Bases (may be useful if the base is large, for example, for several years). The client the base was quite young, so the convolution was inexpedient.

Modernization of the hardware - faster hard drive, new switch, processor, etc.

Install on a web server, Access using a thin client. Here opinions were divided. Someone says, at times faster, someone - that acceleration is not marked.

According to the RKN, to support the work of the messenger without installing such tools by users, Telegram began to actively change IP addresses, from cloud services Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud. Roskomnadzor introduces new IP addresses in the registry and blocks access to them from Russia, but the messenger immediately goes to a new pool of addresses. As Alexander Lyjn, Telegram, noted, the general director of QRATOR LABS, has excellent engineers who now exploit all the shortcomings and vulnerabilities of the filtering system used in Russia. "

IP addresses for several cents per hour

Each device connected to the global network (servers, Internet services, custom devices, etc.), uses the IP address by which it can be found. In total, about 4 billion IP addresses are used in the world, one address can be used by several sites. Initially, Telegram registered five pools for the service, or about 8 thousand IP addresses. By decision of the Tagansky court, they were listed in the register of prohibited and access to them from Russia was blocked; However, according to the RKN, the messenger rented new pools of addresses from Amazon Web Services. As an independent expert suggests (former employee Yandex) Vladimir Ivanov, Roskomnadzor tracked new addresses that Telegram received. As soon as the obtained IP addresses were found in the RKN registry, Telegram received new ones. Moreover, a minute goes to receive new addresses, and on the blocking of a new block of IP addresses at Roskomnadzor, according to Ivanov, it takes an average of about an hour. The cost of such a service at Amazon Web Service ranges from $ 0.0058 per hour.

2. How much can it last?

On Monday, Roskomnadzor publicly reminded the owners of VPN and proxy servers that they must fulfill the court decision on blocking prohibited resources. As a representative of a department stated, they will take "all necessary measures to fulfill the court decision, including those related to restriction of access to Internet resources providing technical conditions for the functioning of Telegram services."

At the same time, Roskomnadzor continued to actively contribute to the register of prohibited new IP addresses used by Telegram. By the middle of day Tuesday, April 17, there were already more than 15.6 million IP addresses in the list, the main part of which was registered on Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud. Most of these addresses are no longer used by Telegram, but removing the blocking of access to them from Russia does not automatically. Amazon and Google will have to negotiate with RKN about removing prohibitions, but it is still unknown, how much time it goes.

According to Alexander Lyamin, with sufficient motivation and resources of Telegram, new methods can invent and bypass the blocking of a very long time. "First, cloud services, in addition to Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud, there is still a lot. There are Azure, Cloudflare, DigitalOcean, ProfitBricks and other small. In addition, there is always an option to create a new transport protocol based on the principles of decentralization - where each Telegram client is a node of the self-organizing network. The question is only in the number of resources from Durov and his willingness to spend money on this, "Lyamin said. According to him, for the Durov, maintaining the service is quite expensive. The expert believes that the founder of Telegram can directly and indirectly lose day to $ 1 million. At the same time, Lyamin reminds that Durov recently attracted $ 1.7 billion on ICO (Initial Coin Offering - primary placement of cryptocurrency coins or tokens, gifts that give Their owners are certain rights) of its TON Blockchalter, that is, it should not be limited in the means.

Another opinion of Vladimir Ivanova. He believes that on juggling IP addresses in the current style of Pavel Duru need no more than $ 0.5-1 thousand per month. However, taking into account the fact that Roskomnadzor began to block entire data centers and even groups of cloud service data centers, such a strategy can allow the messenger to remain affordable in Russia only from a few weeks before the month. "I think Telegram is now working hard on a messenger version based on Peer-to-Peer Protocol, which is almost impossible to block," said Ivanov.

On Tuesday, April 17, Pavel Durov said that while he was intended to support the work of the messenger in Russia. "Although the Russian market is not a substantial share of the user base Telegram (it accounts for less than 10% of the total number of users of the service. - RBC), He is important to us for personal considerations, "the founder of the messenger. He also said that he began to pay the Bitcoin-grants to Proxy and VPN administrators "in the framework of digital resistance - a decentralized movement in defense of digital freedoms and progress." During this year, Durov intends to sacrifice "millions of dollars of personal funds for these purposes."

3. Who suffers from this?

As Pavel Durov, "the quality of life 15 million of Russians worsens, since Telegram without VPN can be at times not available." According to MediaScope, in February (recent data) in Russia, 9.9 million people went to the site or in the Telegram mobile app among residents of cities with a population of more than 100 thousand for comparison: Whatsapp This figure was 24.9 Million users, VIBER - 20.8 million.

Locking IP addresses Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud has already led to the fact that part of the IP addresses used their IP addresses, but not related to Telegram sites turned out to be unavailable. It may be due to the fact that RKN blocks large groups of IP addresses. According to Alexander Lyamin, the middle and small business in Russia suffers most of all from the situation, which, in order to save, it usually does not expand its IT infrastructure, but uses cloud providers. For example, at the online school studying English Skyeng, a significant part of the IT infrastructure used the Amazon Web Services server. As a result, on April 16, many students could not contact their teachers. Skyeng Managing Partner Alexander Larjanovsky appreciated the direct damage from failed lessons in the amount of about 2 million rubles.

Business and Telegram.

Messenger was often used by various entrepreneurs for communications with customers. For example, a loyalty program works on the Messenger's retail network. The buyer connects to the chat bot, receives information about the assortment and discounts. While the blocking did not affect the loyalty program - the company register 400 new users every day. Many sellers show how to set up a VPN and proxy to continue to use the bot without any problems. But the company prepared "Plan B" - a week ago in the "Draftsman" released an application with the same as at the bot, android functionality, published during the week to iOS. "Telegram lock deprived us of an efficient and promoted communication channel with buyers, but the tragedy did not. We are confident that most users will begin to use the application without any problems, "says Marina Purim, which controls the external and internal communications of" Draftstella ".

The founder of Combot Fedor Skuratov will have to be more difficult. It develops bots that help business moderate chat rooms, collect analytics by users and are used for advertising in Telegram-channels. Among the clients are the entertainment community "Dvul", MDK, Channels dedicated to ICO and cryptocolutams, Dreamplay, Binance, DigiBank, the regional community "Little Chat Moscow", "Peterchart" and Ave. "Lock can hit advertising revenues. The Telegram audience has not yet fallen, but, of course, when deleting official applications, the influx of the new audience will be reduced to a multiple. On the other hand, the quality will grow up, "says Socratic.

According to Artem Kazoo, the heads of the organization "RoskomxVobod", which fights for digital rights, expanding the list of prohibited sites can be negatively affected by telecom operators. "The need to filter millions of IP addresses can lead to a decrease in the data transfer rate. Equipment for filtering has its own limit by the number of resources, when moving through which operators may need to change it, "says Kozluk. A representative of a major telecom operator confirmed that expanding the register of prohibited resources can really affect the speed of access to the Internet, especially in small operators. The system limit, according to him, until no one checked. However, at the time of publication, none of the major operators reported similar problems.

4. How can you turn off Telegram at all?

According to an independent expert in the field of telecommunications, Alexey Semenyaki, Roskomnadzor went on the principle and wants to repeat the "feat" with Zello, a mobile radio, which previously also actively used new IP addresses on Amazon Web Services to bypass blocking in Russia. However, after Amazon Web Services appealed to Zello with a request to stop using their platform, the service began to look for other ways to bypass blocking. According to Semenyaki, Roskomnadzor is trying to press on Amazon Web Services, which can have significant financial losses due to blockages so that the service stopped working with Telegram. At the same time, the expert made that Amazon Web Services can break the contract with Durov, but made a reservation that the company will weigh political, commercial and reputational risks. However, given the fact that the cloud providers set, Telegram can "run" from Roskomnadzor for a very long time. At least until the moment that the blocking is not found.

"To make Telegram to use inconvenient, and thus reduce his audience in Russia, probably possible. But completely blocked Telegram in Russia so that no one can use them, Roskomnadzor and communication operators will not be able to. It is possible only if you enter the Internet in Russia on white lists (that is, if access is allowed only to a limited number of "proven" sites. - RBC), "Says Alexey Semenyak. Installed from operators Equipment for filtering simply cannot make a "parsing" of traffic and strip from it the one that comes through protocols used by proxy servers and VPN, for this it will be necessary to be very expensive network equipment.

According to Artem Kazoo, it is possible to completely block Telegram in Russia only with all the Internet.

How often have to see this message? I think everyone who has a long experience with 1C, at least once, came across such an error. Because of what the program gives such a mistake "Block conflicts when performing a transaction: Failed to block the table"?

Well, most often this is due to the fact that someone from users already conducts some kind of operation that has blocked this table. To solve this problem to all users just get out of the program. But it happens so that the user came out of the program, and the process of the program from memory did not unloaded. Do not panic! If all users came out of the program, and the message will still go out, you need to open the service menu -\u003e Active users.

And see who except you currently works with the program. If all users came out, and you still see that besides you there is someone else, do not be scared. It happens. Hung process. Restart the user's computer that is active.

But sometimes even it does not solve the problem. It happens that at the time of execution of the transaction blinks light, or, for example, a hard disk on the last bulk. And that, too, probably someone took out the cord of the network hub, and turned on the kettle in his place, and at this point it was calculated by depreciation. So at such moments the base may be damaged or data can be recorded with an error.

In this case, and almost always, if the above recipes did not help, helps the chdbfl.exe utility. It is located in the folder with the 1C executable file. The path to the file will be approximately such "C: \\ Program Files \\ 1CV82 \\_rexia_Belands \\ Bin \\ cdbfl.exe". Please note that this utility from one version of the platform may not come to another.

Therefore, you need to open the folder, it is with the number of the current platform where you work.

How to see the platform number? Very simple. Go to the service menu -\u003e About the program. And on the picture shows where to watch the platform number.

We put a tick "correct the detected errors." And click the Run button. This utility corrects 90% of all errors that occur. I strongly recommend to make a backup copy of the database before applying this utility, but if the error occurs just at the time of unloading, then copy the entire folder with the information database.

In SSIS, I am trying to use the file system task to move the file to the archive directory. Here's what my task looks like - http://imgur.com/rappzizl

When I start the package, I get a failure in this task: Error: 0xC0014054 In the file system task: Failed to block the variable "\\ xxx \\ yyyy \\ eligibility \\ source_eligibility_import_0482014.csv" To read with an error 0XC0010001 "The variable cannot be found. This happens when an attempt is made to get a variable from the collection of Variables in the container during the execution of the package, and the variable does not exist. The variable name can be changed or the variable is not created. ".

I wonder what this suggests that the variable is not found, because the initial value of the variable is "temp" (see Screenshot), and then I set the value of the variable in the script task a few steps before the start of this task is launched. Therefore, I know that the variable exists and has the correct value (I can open the file in the variable path). I just do not know why and how to get around it. I found the same message sent by others on the Internet, but none of the solutions helped me. I do not see how this could be the condition of the race, the task of the script that sets the value of the variable, ends for a second or so before this task will be performed.

I tried to delete the task of the file system and recreate it, all the same get an error. I also restarted computer thinking that could help, but it is not.

Edit: More information ... If I installed DelayValidation with True on False, I get the same error before anything even starts, although this time it complains about the initial value of the variable before it has the ability to set the code.

Here are concrete mistakes:

Error: 0xc0014054 In the file system Task: Failed to block the variable "\\ xxx \\ yyyy \\ eligibility \\ source_eligibility_import_0482014.csv" To read the error of 0xc0010001, it is impossible to find a variable. This happens when an attempt is made to get a variable from collecting variables in a container in a container The execution time of the package, and the variable is missing. The name of the variable can be changed or the variable is not created. ".

Error: 0xC002F304 In the file system task, the file system task: an error has occurred with the following error message: "Failed to block the variable" \\ xxx \\ yyyy \\ eligibility \\ source_eligibility_import_0482014.csv "To access reading with an error 0xc0010001" It is impossible to find a variable It happens when an attempt is made to get a variable from the collection of Variables in a container while performing a package, and the variable does not exist. The name of the variable can be changed or the variable is not created. ".".

Error: 0xc0014054 In the file system Task: Failed to block the variable "\\ xxx \\ yyyy \\ eligibility \\ Archive" to access reading with an error 0xC0010001 "Unable to find a variable. This happens when an attempt is made to get a variable from the Variables collection on a container during execution Package, and there is no variable there. The name of the variable can be changed or the variable is not created. ".

Error: 0xC002F304 In the file system task, the file system task: an error has occurred with the following error message: "Failed to block the variable" \\ xxx \\ yyyy \\ Availability \\ Archive "For read-to-read error 0xc0010001" This variable cannot be found. This happens when an attempt is made to get a variable from the collection of Variables in a container while performing a package, and the variable does not exist. The name of the variable can be changed or the variable is not created. ".